Abstract
Background and aims: The percentage of tumor cells (tumor cellularity) in a cancerous tissue has been assumed to correlate with the variant allele fraction (VAF) of an identified pathogenic variant. Many laboratories use the tumor cellularity as part of a quality criteria for specimen processing and clinical reporting. However, a systematic study of such correlation has yet to be shown. We performed a relatively large-scale study to determine whether pathologist-estimated tumor cellularity is correlated with next-generation sequencing (NGS)-derived VAF. Materials and Methods: A total of 1511 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) specimens, including formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and fine needle aspirated (FNA) tissues, were analyzed by cancer hotspot NGS. For a given specimen, pathogenic variants of BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, and NRAS were identified and the determined VAFs were correlated with the corresponding tissue tumor cellularity. Results: The coefficient of determination R-squared (R(2)) values were calculated for each correlation. All R(2) values were lower than 0.25, indicating poor correlations. Pathogenic variants were found, not uncommonly, in tumor specimens that carried 10% or lower tumor cellularity. There were no apparent differences of R(2) values between the FFPE and FNA specimens. Conclusion: In both NSCLC and CRC, the lack of linear relationship between tumor cellularity and VAF was found across a wide range of tumor cell percentages. Caution should be used when using tumor cellularity to triage specimens for NGS testing. The tumor cellularity should be considered in relation to the limit of detection of the specific assay for the proper interpretation of a negative test result.