Abstract
Medetomidine, midazolam, and butorphanol (MMB) anesthesia is the preferred choice for rodents but requires excess volume of intramuscular injection in rabbits, which can lead to muscular damage. This study aimed to evaluate a dual-route MMB administration via the intravenous and subcutaneous routes in rabbits. MMB was administered to male Kbs:JW rabbits with an intravenous injection of 0.2 ml/kg followed by a subcutaneous injection of 0.8 ml/kg, totaling 0.2 mg/kg medetomidine, 2.0 mg/kg midazolam, and 2.0 mg/kg butorphanol. We compared the anesthetic effects of this dual-route method with those of intramuscular administration. The dual-route method resulted in a shorter induction time and similar anesthetic duration compared with those of the intramuscular route. While it induced a temporary decrease in body temperature within 30 min post-injection, other vital signs, such as respiration rate, heart rate, and O(2) saturation, remained similar. Notably, unlike intramuscular administration, dual-route administration did not increase tissue injury marker levels. This dual-route MMB administration provided sufficient anesthetic depth during surgery, eliminating pain reflexes. Double-dose administration extended anesthetic duration but resulted in rare fatalities, indicating room for protocol improvement. In conclusion, the novel anesthetic method is preferable for injectable anesthesia in rabbits, providing rapid induction and sufficient anesthetic duration, while potentially minimizing muscle injury. This technique may be beneficial for both laboratory and companion animals and significantly enhance animal welfare in anesthesia by reducing the pain associated with injectable anesthesia.