Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Ten Test (TT) is a touch threshold test that quantifies sensory discrimination by comparing an injured area with a contralateral uninjured area. It's quick, simple, equipment-free and repeatable. However, as a subjective measure, the TT's reliability and applicability need further investigation. This review aimed to investigate if the TT has superior inter- and intra-examiner reliability compared to the widely accepted Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test (WEST) in a human population of all ages. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted on major databases from January 1997 to September 2023 and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Outcomes were assessed with a narrative approach. The included articles were critically appraised according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies two tool. RESULTS: This review included five articles. High inter-examiner reliability was demonstrated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of 0.91 and 0.95, alongside a kappa statistic of 1, as reported by three distinct studies. Intra-examiner reliability displayed some variance, with one study reporting a significant ICC value in four out of six instances. Two studies corroborated that the TT results corresponded with the findings of WEST, each presenting a Spearman rank coefficient of -0.71. CONCLUSION: Our findings underscore the TT's high inter-examiner reliability, though its intra-examiner reliability exhibited some inconsistencies. Interestingly, certain studies claimed its superiority over the WEST. To validate the TT's use in the clinical setting, more rigorous studies, particularly those comparing pre-operative TT outcomes with intraoperative nerve damage evaluations, are essential.