Abstract
Cancer metabolism is a marvellously complex topic, in part, due to the reprogramming of its pathways to self-sustain the malignant phenotype in the disease, to the detriment of its healthy counterpart. Understanding these adjustments can provide novel targeted therapies that could disrupt and impair proliferation of cancerous cells. For this very purpose, genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have been developed, with Human1 being the most recent reconstruction of the human metabolism. Based on GEMs, we introduced the genetic Minimal Cut Set (gMCS) approach, an uncontextualized methodology that exploits the concepts of synthetic lethality to predict metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer. gMCSs define a set of genes whose knockout would render the cell unviable by disrupting an essential metabolic task in GEMs, thus, making cellular proliferation impossible. Here, we summarize the gMCS approach and review the current state of the methodology by performing a systematic meta-analysis based on two datasets of gene essentiality in cancer. First, we assess several thresholds and distinct methodologies for discerning highly and lowly expressed genes. Then, we address the premise that gMCSs of distinct length should have the same predictive power. Finally, we question the importance of a gene partaking in multiple gMCSs and analyze the importance of all the essential metabolic tasks defined in Human1. Our meta-analysis resulted in parameter evaluation to increase the predictive power for the gMCS approach, as well as a significant reduction of computation times by only selecting the crucial gMCS lengths, proposing the pertinency of particular parameters for the peak processing of gMCS.