Abstract
BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) therapy have reported conflicting results. We aimed to investigate the value of SNP typing of TNFα in predicting the efficacy of ADA in AS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with active AS who received ADA treatment were followed up for 24 weeks. Six known SNPs of TNFα (+489G/A, -238G/A, -308G/A, -857C/T, -863C/A, and -1031C/T) were subjected to the SNaPshot SNP typing method, which has been proven to be a reliable, efficient, and cost-effective method for detecting SNPs. The relationship between each SNP genotype and the therapeutic efficacy of ADA was analyzed. RESULTS: At the end of the 24-week follow-up, 58.8% of the patients with AS achieved Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) partial remission (PR), 67.5% of the patients achieved the criteria of an ASAS40 response (40% improvement on indices), and 53.8% of the patients achieved Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) major improvement (MI). The univariate analysis showed that patients with AS carrying the TNFα +489 A allele were more likely to achieve ASAS-PR, ASAS40 response criteria, and ASDAS-MI after ADA treatment. In the multivariate regression analysis, the TNFα +489 A allele was an independent factor influencing the efficacy of ADA in treating AS (ASAS-PR odds ratio (OR) = 2.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-7.01; ASAS40 OR = 4.56, 95% CI = 1.39-15.00; ASDAS-MI OR = 3.31, 95% CI = 1.02-10.69). CONCLUSIONS: The patients carrying the TNFα +489 A allele may be more likely to experience better therapeutic efficacy and achieve the treatment target (ASAS-PR, ASAS40 response, or ASDAS-MI) after receiving ADA treatment. Detection of TNFα +489 G/A may predict the therapeutic efficacy of ADA, which can be used in clinical practice to tailor treatment for individual patients with AS. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods with imaging evaluation are needed to verify our findings.