Abstract
FUNDING ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: Type of funding sources: None. BACKGROUND: TeleCheck-AF is a digital care pathway, which consists of a structured teleconsultation ("Tele") preceded by an app-based on-demand heart rate and rhythm monitoring infrastructure ("Check") and the consecutive integration of the app-derived findings in a comprehensive atrial fibrillation (AF) management. PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in healthcare utilisation and declarable care products during the implementation of the TeleCheck-AF approach in a Dutch AF-clinic. METHODS: Healthcare provided to patients in the Netherlands is based on a diagnosis-treatment combination (Dutch: DBC). Once a patient visits the hospital, a treatment trajectory is opened, which contains the DBC care product. The DBC care products contain diagnostic and therapeutic performances for a certain diagnosis as well as information about reimbursement and are weighted in light (≤ € 200), medium (€ 300-500) and heavy (≥ € 600) depending on the performed diagnostic tests. Patients with AF who were treated with both a conventional approach in 2019 (standard care) and by the TeleCheck-AF approach in 2020 in a Dutch AF-clinic, were compared in this prospective case-crossover analysis. Healthcare utilisation in terms of numbers and modes of outpatient contacts (teleconsultation vs face-to-face), number of emergency department (ED) presentations, use of diagnostic resources (i.e. ECG, Holter) and related reimbursement were analysed. A patient experience survey which encompassed five questions regarding use of the app and patient satisfaction with the remote heart rate and rhythm control was performed. RESULTS: Ninety-one patients with AF from a Dutch AF-clinic (median age 68 years; 43% women) were analysed. Within the conventional approach in 2019, 113 face-to-face consultations and 1 teleconsultation were performed. After the implementation of TeleCheck-AF in 2020 the number of face-to-face consultations reduced by 53% and teleconsultations increased by 2900%. While 151 ECGs and 42 Holter-ECGs were performed within the conventional approach, the number of ECGs in the TeleCheck-AF approach decreased by 48% and number of Holters decreased by 35%. ED presentations did not differ significantly in the conventional compared to TeleCheck-AF approach (22 vs 17). Patients’ satisfaction within the TeleCheck-AF approach was high. The change in healthcare utilisation in TeleCheck-AF treated patients resulted in a mutation in declarable care products weights (towards light weighted DBC) and associated reimbursement. CONCLUSION: The implementation of TeleCheck-AF was associated with a change in health care utilisation which resulted in a disproportional drop in reimbursement by health insurances due to a shift in declarable care products weights. Results of this analysis were basis to design a new reimbursement code for the TeleCheck-AF approach in the Netherlands. [Figure: see text]