Impact of Escherichia coli probiotic strains ED1a and Nissle 1917 on the excretion and gut carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli in pigs

大肠杆菌益生菌菌株ED1a和Nissle 1917对猪体内产超广谱β-内酰胺酶大肠杆菌的排泄和肠道携带的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of the administration of two Escherichia coli probiotic strains (ED1a and Nissle 1917) to pigs on the gut carriage or shedding of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli. The probiotics were given to four sows from 12 days before farrowing to the weaning day, and to the 23 piglets (infected treated group (IPro)) from birth to the age of 49 days. Four other sows and their 24 piglets (infected non-treated group (INT)) did not receive the probiotics. IPro and INT piglets (n = 47) were orally inoculated with the strain E. coli 17-348F-RifR carrying the bla (CTX-M-1) gene and resistant to rifampicin. Cefotaxime-resistant (CTX(R)) E. coli and rifampicin-resistant (Rif(R)) E. coli were cultured and excretion of probiotics was studied using PCR on individual faecal and post-mortem samples, and from manure collected after the challenge with resistant E. coli. CTX(R) and Rif(R) E (.) coli isolates were characterized to detect transfer of the bla (CTX-M-1) to other strains(.). Overall, there was no significant reduction in faecal excretion of CTX(R) and Rif(R) E. coli in IPro pigs compared with INT pigs, although the CTX(R) and Rif(R) E. coli titres were slightly, but significantly lower in the colon, caecum and rectum at post mortem. Excretion of the probiotics decreased with age, but Nissle 1917 was detected in most pigs at post-mortem. No transfer of the bla (CTX-M-1) gene to probiotic and other E. coli strains was detected. In conclusion, in our experimental conditions, the used probiotics did not reduce shedding of the challenge strain.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。