Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies show an inverse association between cigarette smoking and Parkinson's disease (PD), suggesting a potential protective effect of smoking on PD incidence, despite the well-established and overwhelming harms of smoking to human health. We integrated genomic and proteomic approaches to investigate the causality and molecular basis of this potential relationship. METHODS: We analyzed summary statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of smoking initiation (SmkInit), smoking intensity, and PD. Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) tested whether genetic liability to smoking behaviors causally influences PD risk. Shared genomic architecture was quantified using MiXeR, and conjunctional false discovery rate (conjFDR) analysis identified loci jointly associated with smoking and PD, which were then mapped to genes and tested for tissue enrichment. To identify mediating proteins, we integrated dorsolateral prefrontal cortex proteomic data with GWAS using proteome-wide association studies (PWAS), summary-based MR, heterogeneity in dependent instruments testing, and colocalization. Finally, the druggability of convergent genes was evaluated. RESULTS: MR analyses indicated a protective effect of genetic liability to SmkInit on PD risk (OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91, P = 1.5 x 10 (-3) ), which was consistent across sensitivity analyses and not suggestive of directional pleiotropy. However, no significant effect of genetic liability to cigarettes per day (CigDay) on PD risk was found. MiXeR revealed modest polygenic overlap between SmkInit and PD (13.9%; genetic correlation r (g) = -0.16) and between CigDay and PD (22.9%; r (g) = -0.09). ConjFDR identified 95 shared loci for SmkInit-PD and 26 for CigDay-PD. SmkInit-PD loci mapped to genes involved in neurotrophic signaling, synaptic organization, microglial modulation, and mitochondrial stress responses, with expression enriched in substantia nigra, basal ganglia, and interconnected cortical regions. PWAS identified 11 proteins shared by PD and SmkInit and 5 shared with CigDay, several of which (AKT3, MAPT, RIT2, EXD2, and PPP3CC) were supported by both genomic and proteomic analyses. Druggability assessment highlighted six proteins with existing pharmacologic modulation potential, spanning neurotrophic, microglial, proteostatic, and ion-channel pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic liability to smoking initiation appears to confer modest protection against PD. Integrative genomic and proteomic evidence converges on neurotrophic, synaptic, microglial, and mitochondrial pathways as shared mechanisms, identifying biologically coherent potential therapeutic targets for advancing smoke-free neuroprotective strategies in PD.