Building Disaster-Ready Research Ecosystems: Evidence from Doctoral Scholars from Tertiary Care Institute in India

构建应对灾害的研究生态系统:来自印度三级医疗机构博士生的证据

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pandemics and natural disasters have historically disrupted research ecosystems worldwide. In India, for example, the COVID-19 epidemic, the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami, and the 1918 influenza pandemic have not only impacted education systems but also research-related activities. Early-career scholars were disproportionately affected by the severe disruptions to research activity induced by the COVID-19 Pandemic. AIM: To determine and examine the difficulties PhD research scholars encountered in India during the COVID-19 Pandemic and to understand coping mechanisms used to minimise uncertainties. METHODS: Among full-time PhD scholars at a tertiary healthcare institution in India, we conducted a sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. A pre-validated online questionnaire was used to gather quantitative data, and focus group discussions (FGDs) were held to examine problems and potential solutions further. Descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, and triangulation of questionnaire and FGD results were used to examine the data. RESULTS: 16 scholars participated in FGDs, and 41 scholars completed the questionnaire. Administrative barriers, logistical obstacles, time limits from pandemic-related tasks, participant recruitment issues, infrastructure closures, and missed opportunities for collaboration were the six thematic domains of difficulty that surfaced. Five types of coping techniques were identified: emotion-focused, meaning-focused, problem-focused, problem-avoidance, and social-focused coping. Adaptive measures, such as local material sourcing, skill development through online platforms, and alternative data collection, were used by scholars. CONCLUSION: Natural calamities and pandemics have a systemic impact on research, particularly for early-career researchers. Flexible deadlines, emergency funding, streamlined teamwork, and crisis-adaptive ethics review procedures were among the few recommendations.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。