A comparative study of single versus double venous anastomosis with microvascular anastomotic coupler device (MACD) in maxillofacial reconstructions with free flaps

一项关于使用显微血管吻合器装置(MACD)进行颌面部游离皮瓣重建中单静脉吻合与双静脉吻合的比较研究

阅读:1

Abstract

Recently, venous couplers have been routinely employed for free flap surgery. Its use is justified considering the large number of backlog cases as well as for surgeon and patient benefit. However, venous thrombosis remains a worrisome problem in the use of venous couplers. Although the efficacy of venous couplers has been found to be equal to that of hand-sewn anastomosis, comparison of single versus double venous coupler anastomosis has not been reported. A prospective randomized study carried between 2020 and 2024 included 154 patients who underwent maxillofacial free flap reconstruction; these patients were divided into two groups based on the number of venous coupler anastomoses performed. (Single MACD, n = 82 vs. Double MACD, n = 72). Data were evaluated for demographics, perioperative details, vascular thrombosis, flap complications and flap loss. There were no significant differences regarding comorbidities or ASA status between the two groups. Overall, there was no significant difference regarding the rate of venous thrombosis (1 MACD: 2.44% versus 2 MACD: 2.78%, p > 0.05) or flap loss (1 MACD: 1.22% versus 2 MACD: 1.39%, p > 0.05). As our overall survivability rate was more than 97% in each group, it can be concluded that flap survivability is not dependent on the number of venous coupler anastomoses and that it would be safe to proceed with single venous coupler anastomosis with close flap monitoring. Various other factors, such as improper technique, intimal injury, hematoma and pedicle compression, may play more prominent roles in flap survivability.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。