BOOTStrap-SCI: Beyond One option of treatment for spinal trauma and spinal cord injury: Consensus-based stratified protocols for pre-hospital care and emergency room (part I)

BOOTStrap-SCI:脊髓创伤和脊髓损伤治疗的多种选择:基于共识的院前护理和急诊室分层方案(第一部分)

阅读:1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spinal trauma (STx), with or without spinal cord injury (SCI), represents a significant global health burden, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Existing guidelines often rely on tools and resources that are not always universally available, especially in less resourced settings, contributing to disparities in care and outcomes. A pragmatic, resource-adapted approach may help optimize management in these contexts. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study aimed to develop resource-adapted protocols for pre-hospital and emergency room management of STx and SCI, addressing challenges specific to LMICs while supported by clinical evidence and expert based practices. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A multidisciplinary Delphi consensus combined international evidence-based guidelines with expert opinions. Iterative discussions and voting by healthcare providers from LMICs and high-income countries (HICs) ensured the development of context-sensitive protocols. These were tailored to varying levels of training, resource availability, and healthcare infrastructure. RESULTS: The resulting protocols address key areas of pre-hospital and emergency management, including initial resuscitation, immobilization, clinical interventions, and timely referral. These protocols emphasize adaptability, providing structured plus flexible guidance for optimizing care according to specific contexts from low to high resourced clinical settings. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The proposed protocols are not intended as gold-standard guidelines but as adaptable frameworks to guide management of STx/SCI in contexts with different availability of resources. By addressing disparities in resource availability and clinical competencies, they can serve as a foundation for local adaptations and improvements in care. Future research should evaluate their implementation and impact on outcomes.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。