Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the trade-offs low-resource setting community members were willing to make in regard to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care using a discrete choice experiment survey. METHODS: We administered a discrete choice experiment survey to a sample of community members 18 years or older across South Africa between April and May 2022. Participants were presented with 18 paired choice tasks comprised of 5 attributes (distance to closest adequate facility, provider of care, response time, chances of survival, and transport cost) and a range of 3 to 5 levels. We used mixed logit models to evaluate respondents' preferences for selected attributes. RESULTS: Analyses were based on 2228 responses and 40 104 choice tasks. Patients valued care with the shortest response time, delivered by the highest qualified individuals, which placed them within the shortest distance of an adequate facility, gave them the highest chance of survival, and costed the least. In addition, patients preferred care delivered by their family members over care delivered by the lay public. The highest mean willingness-to-pay for increased survival is 11 699 South African rand (ZAR), followed by distance to health facility (8108 ZAR), and response time (5678 ZAR), and the lowest for increasing specialization of provider (1287 ZAR). CONCLUSIONS: In low-resource settings, it may align with patients' preference to include targeted resuscitation training for family members of individuals with high-risk for cardiac arrest as a part of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest intervention strategies.