Impact of collateral flow on recanalization in different thrombectomy techniques

侧支循环对不同血栓切除术中血管再通的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

Cerebral collateral status is considered an independent prognostic factor in stroke patients. We aimed to assess whether collateral extent also modifies first-pass recanalization (FPR) and distal emboli generation across different mechanical thrombectomy (MT) strategies. Two in-vitro neurovascular models were created: good (GCM) and poor collaterals model (PCM). Both were identical up to the M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA), but only the GCM included primary and secondary anastomoses. Soft (stiffness = 53.72 ± 5.32 kPa) and stiff (stiffness = 110.02 ± 10.59 kPa) clot analogs embolized the M1-MCA. The study was randomized for thrombectomy technique: direct aspiration thrombectomy, partial stent retriever retraction and complete stent retriever retraction. Outcome measures were: complete (TICI2c-3), substantial (TICI2b-3) recanalization, and distal emboli parameters. A total of 240 MTs were performed (20 experiments per technique/model/clot type). Overall rates of complete and substantial recanalization were 23.8% and 68.8% respectively. Complete recanalization was higher in GCM (33.3%) than in PCM (14.2%; p < 0.01) regardless of clot type or technique. Across all clot types and collateral status, complete stent-retriever technique achieved highest rate of TICI 2b-3 and direct aspiration the highest rates of TICI 2c-3, particularly in PCM. Partial stent-retriever retraction technique was the least effective. In our experimental setup, there were no significant differences in distal embolization according to collaterals or clot types, however partial stent-retriever retraction technique generated the highest embolic load and direct aspiration the lowest. The degree of collateral circulation may modify MT angiographic outcomes with different impacts according to techniques or clot composition and could be used to guide therapeutic decisions.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。