Abstract
Background: The application of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) helps provide accurate clinical staging for lung cancer patients. However, the effects and trends in early-stage lung cancer remain unclear. The aim of this study was to compare differences between clinical stage I lung cancer patients who received PET/CT for staging and those who did not. Methods: Data were obtained from the Taiwan Society of Cancer Registry. There were 6587 clinical stage I lung cancer patients between 2009 and 2014 analyzed in this study. We compared the characteristics of the PET/CT and no PET/CT groups. After propensity score matching, it resulted in both groups having 2649 patients. We measured the overall survival rates of all clinical stage I lung cancer patients and the overall survival rates of patients with PET/CT and without PET/CT. Results: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of all clinical stage I lung cancer patients were 97.2%, 88.2%, and 79.0%, respectively. Patients with a larger tumor size tended to receive PET/CT for staging (stage Ib: 38.25% vs. 27.82%, p < 0.0001) and a larger resection (lobectomy: 74.62% vs. 66.61%, p < 0.0001). The 5-year survival rates were 79.8% in the PET/CT group and 78.2% in the no PET/CT group after propensity score matching (p = 0.6528). Conclusions: For clinical stage I lung cancer in Taiwan, patients with larger tumor sizes tend to have PET/CT for staging. Although PET/CT provided more precise clinical staging, these patients still received larger resections and had more pathological migration. However, there was no overall survival rate benefit after PET/CT.