How Often, where and by whom are Adverse Experiences Recorded in Clinical Records of Service-Users Under the Care of an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) Service?

在精神病早期干预 (EIP) 服务中,服务使用者的不良经历多久记录一次?在哪里记录?由谁记录?

阅读:1

Abstract

Research indicates high prevalence rates of adverse experiences in people experiencing first-episode psychosis. Despite recommendations that mental health staff should routinely ask about adverse experiences, documentation indicates these are not being recorded in service-users' clinical records across different mental health settings. This study audited 48 service-user records in a UK early intervention in psychosis (EIP) community mental health service to examine how often, where, and by whom adverse experiences were recorded. Searching for 22 adverse experience terms, 64.6% of clinical records documented at least one adverse experience, with 80.6% reporting more than one. The profession that most often recorded adverse experiences in service-users' clinical records was psychiatrists. While EIP services may document adverse experiences more frequently than other community mental health settings, recorded rates remain lower than expected based on previous research prevalence rates. Further studies should consider adverse experiences recording across UK EIP services to ensure service-users with adverse experiences receive appropriate support.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。