Abstract
Although there has been an increase in bench test evaluation of mechanical ventilators in recent years, a publication gap remains in assessing Pressure Control Continuous Mandatory Ventilation Modes with a set point targeting scheme PC-CMVs. This study evaluates the operational variability in PC-CMVs of eleven transport and emergency ventilators used in ICU units in Brazil during the COVID-19 pandemic. The assessment involved a comprehensive set of test scenarios derived from existing literature and the NBR ISO 80601-2-12:2014 standard. Nine parameters were computed for five consecutive breaths, offering a comprehensive characterization of pressure and flow waveforms. Most ventilators had Inspiratory pressure and PEEP values that fell outside of the tolerance ranges. Notably, three mechanical ventilators failed to reach the target pressures within the specified inspiratory times during test scenarios with a higher time constant (τ). We observed significant differences among emergency and transport ventilators in all assessed parameters, indicating a performance difference in PC-CMVs modes. The current results might help clinicians determine which ventilator models are suitable for specific clinical situations, particularly when unfavorable circumstances compel doctors to use ventilators that may not provide adequate support for patients in intensive care units.