Evaluation of the efficacy of microneedling alone and in combination with injectable hyaluronic acid in augmentation of peri-implant soft tissues: A randomized controlled trial

评估微针疗法单独使用及联合注射用透明质酸治疗种植体周围软组织增容的疗效:一项随机对照试验

阅读:1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of injectable hyaluronic acid (HA) combined with microneedling (MN) in augmenting peri-implant soft tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled and divided into two groups. Group 1 received MN alone, while Group 2 received HA following MN on the peri-implant mucosa. Various parameters - including the plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), peri-implant probing depth, clinical attachment levels, Sulcus Bleeding Index, mucosal thickness (MT), keratinized tissue width (KTW), interproximal width (IPW), and papillary recession height (PRH) - were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures were assessed to gauge treatment effectiveness and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Group 2 patients exhibited reduced PI, GI, SBI, PIPD, and CAL compared to Group 1. Both groups showed a significant increase in MT and KTW after 6 months; MT increased to 1.03 ± 0.11 mm in Group 1 and 2.48 ± 0.45 mm in Group 2, while KTW increased to 2.44 ± 0.84 mm in Group 1 and 4.34 ± 1.02 mm in Group 2. In addition, the mean PRH was 1.67 ± 0.32 mm in Group 1 and 0.88 ± 0.25 mm in Group 2, with a mean IPW of 2.19 ± 0.52 mm in Group 1 and 0.90 ± 0.16 mm in Group 2. CONCLUSION: HA combined with MN leads to increased MT and KTW, reduced inflammation, and improved papillary fill. Thus, HA with MN may serve as an effective short-term implant maintenance modality, assisting clinicians in achieving peri-implant soft tissue regeneration.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。