Comparison of safety and efficacy between double LVIS and flow diverter for Blister-Like aneurysms: a multicenter retrospective study

双腔静脉介入治疗与血流导向装置治疗水泡状动脉瘤的安全性和有效性比较:一项多中心回顾性研究

阅读:1

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of using double overlapping LVIS and single Flow Diverter for the treatment of Blood Blister-like aneurysms (BBAs) in the internal carotid artery. In this retrospectively study, 88 patients with BBAs in the internal carotid artery who initially underwent treatment with either double LVIS or single Pipeline, with or without coiling, were recruited from four institutions between 2016 and 2023. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was utilized to balance the confounding factors. The overall rate of procedural complications was 17.0%, with favorable clinical outcomes observed in 89.8% of cases and complete IA occlusion achieved in 89.6% of cases. Procedure-related complications were found to be significant predictors of unfavorable clinical outcomes, while incomplete aneurysm occlusion on immediate angiography was a significant predictor of incomplete occlusion during follow-up (p<0.05). Double LVIS and single FD treatment, with or without coiling, demonstrated comparable rates of procedural complications, aneurysm occlusion, and favorable clinical outcomes at follow-up, both before and after propensity score matching (p>0.05). Double LVIS treatment with coiling was determined to be a safe, effective, and feasible alternative option for the treatment of BBAs.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。