Comparison of approaches for surface vessel diameter and pulsatility quantification

比较用于量化表面血管直径和搏动性的方法

阅读:1

Abstract

Cerebral blood vessels change diameter with each heartbeat, in response to oxygen demand, and during pathological states. To study these dynamics, vessel diameters are often quantified from intravital microscope images. We compare three different image-based vessel diameter measurement algorithms: one that uses an intensity threshold (cross section threshold (CST)), one that performs a Radon transform then calculates its full width at half maximum (FWHM), and a newly developed algorithm that leverages the intensity gradient (find image edges (FIE)). Using synthetic data, we find that the average errors in FIE, CST, and FWHM are 3.7%, 2.4%, and 0.2%, respectively, for images with a low noise-to-signal ratio (NSR = 0.07). Of the three, FIE best maintains accuracy for images with larger NSR and brightness gradients, though a modification to FWHM allows it to maintain accuracy with larger NSR. We also introduce a novel approach to quantify the vessel pulsation amplitude based on the interquartile range (IQR) and find it to be as accurate as an existing method, phase averaging (PA). FIE is best for measuring relative changes in vessel diameter and the average diameter in the presence of noise or other lighting artifacts, and FWHM is best for measuring the average diameter.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。