Abstract
Gait symmetry is one of the most informative aspects describing the quality of gait. Many indices have been proposed to quantify gait symmetry. Among them, indices focusing on the comparison of the two body sides (e.g., Symmetry Angle, SA) and indices based on the analysis of the locomotor act as a whole, dealing with the body center of mass (e.g., Symmetry Index, SI(BCoM)) or lower trunk accelerometry (e.g., improved Harmonic Ratio, iHR) have been proposed. Remarkably, the relationship between these indices has received little attention so far, as well as the influence of gait speed on their values. The aim of this study is to investigate this relationship by comparing the SA, SI(BCoM), and iHR, and to explore the effect of walking speed on these indices. Ten healthy adults walked for 60 s on a treadmill at seven different speeds (from 0.28 to 1.95 m s(-1)) and simulate an asymmetric gait (ASYM) at 0.83 m s(-1). Marker-based trajectories were recorded, and the body center of mass 3D trajectory was obtained. Simultaneously, lower trunk 3D linear accelerations were collected using a triaxial accelerometer. SI(BCoM), iHR, and SA were calculated for each stride, each anatomical direction, and each condition. Perfect symmetry was never displayed in any axes and any indices. Significant differences existed between SI(BCoM), and iHR in all anatomical directions (p < 0.0001). The walking speed significantly affected SI(BCoM) and iHR values in anteroposterior and craniocaudal directions, but not in mediolateral. Conversely, no walking speed effect was found for SA (p = 0.28). All three indices significantly discriminated between ASYM and the corresponding walking condition (p < 0.05). Gait symmetry may differ significantly according to the data source, mathematical approach, and walking speed. Healthy individuals display an asymmetrical gait and acknowledging this aspect is crucial when establishing rehabilitation objectives and assessing the quality of gait in the clinical setting.