Abstract
Background: Achieving ideal anchorage is crucial in orthodontics for controlled tooth movement. Miniscrews (MSs) have improved skeletal anchorage, but freehand placement poses risks like root damage and limited precision. Guided techniques, including radiographic guides and computer-assisted methods (static [sCAS] and dynamic [dCAS]), were developed to enhance accuracy and safety. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and accuracy of MS placement using different guidance approaches. Materials: A systematic search up to March 2024 identified studies on guided MS insertion, assessing safety (root contact/damage) and accuracy (angular, coronal, and apical deviations) of guided vs. freehand placement. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and study quality using RoB 2 for RCTs, NOS for cohort studies, and an adapted tool for pre-clinical studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for studies with common parameters, and safety outcomes were pooled using logit-transformed proportions. Heterogeneity was evaluated with I² and χ² tests. Results: Eleven studies (652 MSs) were included, though no dCAS studies were analyzed. The only RCT had "some concerns" regarding risk of bias, cohort studies ranged from medium to low quality, and most pre-clinical studies had high bias risk. sCAS significantly reduced root damage compared to freehand methods (OR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.04-0.36; p < 0.001; I² = 1%) and reduced angular and linear deviations. Due to heterogeneity, no quantitative synthesis of accuracy outcomes was performed. Conclusions: sCAS improves the safety and accuracy of MS insertion compared to freehand and radiographic guide methods. These results highlight the clinical benefits of sCAS in orthodontics. Future studies should refine protocols and explore dCAS for further accuracy improvements.