Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Tenecteplase (TNK-tPA) has several benefits over alteplase (tPA) in treatment of acute ischaemic stroke. Randomised controlled trials have shown promising results. In June 2017, the Stroke Unit at Sundsvall County Hospital switched from tPA to TNK-tPA in standard clinical practice. This study examines the effects of that shift. METHODS: All thrombolysis treatments performed during the first twenty-four months with TNK-tPA (168) were compared to the last twenty-four months with tPA (191). Data were collected from patient records. Follow-up time was 30 days. Co-primary outcomes were death and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH). Secondary outcomes were types of intracerebral bleeding and cause of death. Tertiary outcome was door-to-needle time (DNT). RESULTS: Treatment groups were of comparable age (75.7 ± 0.2 years). tPA-treated patients had an NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score of 9.2 versus 7.5 for TNK-tPA. Patients older than 80 had more severe strokes (median NIHSS 9 versus 5). SICH occurred in 6 (3.6 %) patients in the TNK-tPA group and in 2 (1.0 %) treated with tPA, odds ratio (OR) 3.41 (0.70-16.7). Numbers for death were 21 (12.5 %) and 31 (15.2 %), OR 0.77 (0.46-1.29), meaning no statistically significant differences in primary outcomes. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Predominant cause of death was cerebral infarction. DNT with tenecteplase was shorter: mean 44 versus 26, and median 35 versus 19 min. CONCLUSIONS: Switching from alteplase to tenecteplase was associated with shorter time to treatment. To draw certain conclusions regarding safety or efficacy would require a larger material.