Abstract
BACKGROUND: The healthy worker effect may distort the association between exposure and health effects in workers. However, few studies have investigated both the healthy worker hire and survival effects simultaneously, and they are limited to mortality studies in male workers. METHODS: We utilized a data set comprising South Korean diagnostic medical radiation workers registered in the National Dose Registry between 1996 and 2011, and merged it with mortality and cancer incidence data. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were computed for comparison with the general population. To account for time-varying confounders influenced by prior occupational radiation exposure, we applied g-estimation using structural nested accelerated failure time models and compared the outcomes with those from Weibull regression. RESULTS: A total of 1831 deaths and 3759 first primary cancer cases were identified among 93 918 workers. Both male (SMR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.42, 0.46) and female workers (SMR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.60) showed lower mortality rates compared with national rates. In the SIR analysis, male workers exhibited reduced risks of solid cancer whereas female workers had increased risks. The g-estimation-derived hazard ratios (HRs) from radiation exposure exceeded those from Weibull regression estimates for all-cause death (HR = 2.55; 95% CI: 1.97, 3.23) and all-cancer incidence (HR = 1.96; 95% CI: 1.52, 2.55) in male workers whereas female workers showed the opposite results. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive consideration of the healthy worker effect by sex is essential for estimating the unbiased impact of occupational exposure on health outcomes, notably in studies focusing on male mortality.