Abstract
Bacterial growth and proliferation can be restricted by limiting the availability of metal ions in their environment. Humans sequester iron, manganese, and zinc to help prevent infection by pathogens, a system termed nutritional immunity. Commercially used chelants have high binding affinities with a variety of metal ions, which may lead to antibacterial properties that mimic these innate immune processes. However, the modes of action of many of these chelating agents in bacterial growth inhibition and their selectivity in metal deprivation in cellulo remain ill-defined. We address this shortcoming by examining the effect of 11 chelators on Escherichia coli growth and their impact on the cellular concentration of five metals. The following four distinct effects were uncovered: (i) no apparent alteration in metal composition, (ii) depletion of manganese alongside reductions in iron and zinc levels, (iii) reduced zinc levels with a modest reduction in manganese, and (iv) reduced iron levels coupled with elevated manganese. These effects do not correlate with the absolute known chelant metal ion affinities in solution; however, for at least five chelators for which key data are available, they can be explained by differences in the relative affinity of chelants for each metal ion. The results reveal significant insights into the mechanism of growth inhibition by chelants, highlighting their potential as antibacterials and as tools to probe how bacteria tolerate selective metal deprivation. IMPORTANCE Chelating agents are widely used in industry and consumer goods to control metal availability, with bacterial growth restriction as a secondary benefit for preservation. However, the antibacterial mechanism of action of chelants is largely unknown, particularly with respect to the impact on cellular metal concentrations. The work presented here uncovers distinct metal starvation effects imposed by different chelants on the model Gram-negative bacterium Escherichia coli. The chelators were studied both individually and in pairs, with the majority producing synergistic effects in combinations that maximize antibacterial hostility. The judicious selection of chelants based on contrasting cellular effects should enable reductions in the quantities of chelant required in numerous commercial products and presents opportunities to replace problematic chemistries with biodegradable alternatives.