Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to assess the perioperative morbidity, mortality and long-term survival of octogenarians undergoing acute type A aortic dissection repair (ATAAD), and to compare open and closed distal anastomosis techniques. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study (2007-2021). Open versus closed distal anastomosis were compared. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methods were used to compare long-term survival. RESULTS: Fifty octogenarian patients were included (median age-82 years; closed distal-22; open distal-28). Median cardiopulmonary bypass time was 187 min (open distal vs. closed distal group; 219 min vs. 115.5 min, p < 0.01, respectively). Median cross-clamp time was 93 min (IQR; 76-130 min). Median circulatory arrest time was 26 min (IQR; 20-39 min) in the open-distal group. In-hospital mortality was 18% (open distal; 14.2% vs. closed distal; 22.7%, p = 0.44). Stroke was 26% (open distal; 28.6% vs. closed distal; 22.7%, p = 0.64). Median survival was 7.2 years (IQR; 4.5-11.6 years). Survival was comparable between open and closed distal groups (median 10.6 vs. 7.2 years, p = 0.35, respectively). Critical preoperative status (HR; 3.2, p = 0.03) and composite endpoint (renal replacement therapy, new neurological event, length of stay > 30 days or return to theatre; HR; 4.1, p = 0.02) predicted adverse survival. Open distal anastomosis did no impact survival. CONCLUSIONS: ATAAD repair in selected octogenarians has acceptable short- and long-term survival. There is no significant difference between open versus closed distal anastomosis strategies.