Comparison of two fixation techniques of olecranon osteotomy after reconstruction of intra-articular distal humerus fractures

比较两种鹰嘴截骨术后关节内肱骨远端骨折重建固定技术

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate surgical fixation of intra-articular distal humerus fractures require olecranon osteotomy. Repair of osteotomy is achieved with a variety of techniques but no consensus has been achieved regarding the optimum technique for fixing the olecranon osteotomy. In this retrospective study, we compared the functional and radiological outcome of the two commonly used techniques of fixing olecranon osteotomy after fixing distal humerus intra-articular fractures. We hypothesized that olecranon osteotomy fixed with 6.5 mm cancellous intramedullary screw alone yielded better radiological and functional outcome than fixation with cerclage wire over cancellous screw applied in figure of eight as tension band wiring (TBW). AIM: To determine the radiological and functional outcome of olecranon osteotomy fixation with cancellous screw alone vs cancellous screw combined with cerclage wiring applied as TBW. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted in Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar Pakistan. Intra-articular distal humerus fractures fulfilling the inclusion criteria and operated during 2023 to 2025 were included. Olecranon osteotomy fixation with 6.5 mm cancellous screw alone was labelled as group A while cerclage wire over cancellous screw in figure of eight as TBW were labelled as group B. The demographics, radiological and functional outcome in both groups were compared at one year using Mayo Elbow Performance Score and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score. RESULTS: We included 32 patients in this study. The mean age of group A patients was 34 ± 5.5 years while group B had a mean age of 34 ± 6.2 years. Radiological union of olecranon osteotomy was achieved in all cases in both groups. Functional outcome however was significantly better in group A than in group B (P < 0.05). The Mayo Elbow Performance Score was excellent in 14 (87.5%) and good in 2 (12.5%) patients in group A while 7 (43.47%) patients had excellent outcome, 5 (31.25%) good and 4 (25%) had fair outcome in group B. The mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Score was 24.5 ± 2.1 and 78.1 ± 12.1 in group A and B respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Similar radiological union was achieved in all patients of olecranon osteotomy treated with intramedullary screw alone and intramedullary screw with TBW. Functional outcome however was significantly better in intramedullary screw alone than in intramedullary screw with TBW.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。