Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aortic valve infective endocarditis (IE) complicated by an aortic root abscess is a challenging problem that leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Aortic root repair or replacement are two potential treatment options. We aimed to compare patients undergoing aortic root repair or replacement with short- and mid-term outcomes. METHODS: Consecutive patients with active aortic valve IE complicated by aortic root abscess undergoing cardiac surgery from January 2012 to January 2022 were included. Patients receiving aortic root repair were compared to patients undergoing aortic root replacement. Endpoints included overall mortality, incidence of recurrent IE and re-intervention during a two-year follow-up period. Inverse propensity weighting was employed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients with aortic valve IE with root abscess underwent surgical therapy. Fifty-six patients received aortic root repair and seventeen patients underwent aortic root replacement. Patients undergoing root replacement had significantly higher surgical risk (EuroSCORE II: 9 versus 19, p = 0.02) and extended disease (circumferential annular abscess: 9% versus 41%, p < 0.01). Inverse propensity weighted analysis revealed no relationship between surgical strategy and outcome. Weighted regression analysis revealed EuroSCORE II and disease extension as significant predictors of 30-day and 2-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with aortic valve IE with root abscess, root repair is mostly performed in lower-risk patients with limited disease extension. Short- and mid-term mortality, recurrent endocarditis and reintervention were comparable between surgical strategies during follow-up. Surgical risk and disease extension, rather than surgical strategy, seem to be significant predictors of short- and mid-term mortality.