Impact of Intravenous Hydrocortisone on Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Outcomes in Patients Receiving Vasopressor Support Following On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

静脉注射氢化可的松对接受体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后血管加压药支持的患者术后房颤及预后的影响

阅读:1

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although 2019 EACTS Guidelines on Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Adult Cardiac Surgery recommend against routine use of prophylactic corticosteroids, perioperative glucocorticoids are still often used to mitigate hypotension, cardiac arrhythmias and respiratory failure following surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Limited data exists on safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) hydrocortisone in this setting. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of intravenous hydrocortisone on postoperative complications after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective chart review between 2021 and 2023. Adult patients with on-pump CABG requiring vasopressor therapy postoperatively were included. RESULTS: Of 153 patients included, 39 received IV hydrocortisone and 114 did not. The hydrocortisone group had significantly lower cortisol levels (15.8 mcg/dL vs 23.9 mcg/dL, P < 0.001) and higher incidence of a past medical history of atrial fibrillation (23.1% vs 2.6%, P < 0.001) compared to the control group. Rates of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) were similar between groups with 23.1% in the hydrocortisone group and 21.9% in the control group (P = 0.88), which maintained after controlling for age, history of atrial fibrillation, sex, and propensity score (P = 0.86). Mean cumulative norepinephrine equivalents (NEE) were similar between hydrocortisone group and control (10.4 mcg/min vs 8.9 mcg/min, P = 0.12). Hydrocortisone administration was associated with longer durations of vasopressor therapy (45.8 vs 28.9 hours, P = 0.001), insulin therapy (149.4 vs 82.2 hours, P = 0.003), and total mechanical ventilation time (59.3 vs 19.4 hours, P = 0.049). There were no differences in surgical site infections between the hydrocortisone group versus control group (5.2% vs 5.2%, P = 1.00), including both non-infectious (2.6% vs 2.6%, P = 1.00) and infectious surgical site complications (2.6% vs 2.6%, P = 1.00). CONCLUSION: After controlling for sex, age, history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, and propensity score, there was no significant association between the administration of IV hydrocortisone and POAF in patients receiving vasopressor support following on-pump CABG. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。