Abstract
Background Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) results in sudden, painless vision loss. As an analogous condition to acute ischemic stroke, CRAO is an ophthalmological emergency, but a standardized treatment is lacking. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been widely used in spite of the inconsistent results reported. Purpose To report the visual acuity (VA) outcomes in all patients submitted to HBOT with non-arteritic CRAO in a tertiary center. Methods This retrospective study included all adult patients with CRAO and symptoms lasting for less than 24 hours who were prescribed HBOT in the Hyperbaric Medicine Unit of a Portuguese hospital from March 2009 to February 2023. Patient demographic information, medical history, ophthalmologic evaluation, hospital of referral, time until HBOT, supplementary treatments, number of HBOT sessions, adverse effects, and patient subjective VA gain were collected. All patients were subjected to 90-minute HBOT sessions with 100% oxygen at 2.4 ATA. The primary outcome was VA change (dif-logMAR) before and after treatment. A clinically significant visual improvement was defined as a dif-logMAR≥0.3. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29 (Released 2021; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) (p<0.05 is considered significant). Results A total of 114 patients were included in this study; 68% (n=77) were male, with a mean age of 69 years, and were subjected to a median number of seven HBOT sessions. No serious adverse effects from HBOT were reported. The mean time delay from symptoms to treatment was 12 hours, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline was counting fingers or worse in 84% (n=96) of the patients. A dif-logMAR≥0.3 occurred in 46% (n=52) of the patients, and 58% (n=66) reported subjective VA improvement after the treatment. A significant improvement between BCVA before HBOT (2.12±0.74) and after HBOT (1.67±0.74) was observed. The VA outcome was found to be related to the total number of sessions, age, obesity, supplementary treatments, and cherry-red spot (CRS) at presentation. There were no significant effects of the time delay from symptoms to treatment in the explanation of the VA outcome. Conclusions HBOT appears to be safe and has a beneficial effect on VA outcomes in patients with non-arteritic CRAO, particularly depending on the number of sessions. Patient factors such as age, obesity, and the presence of CRSs also appear to influence the VA outcome.