Conclusion
Our study found that there were significant differences in the m6A methylation patterns of circRNAs between CRC and NC tissues. M6A methylation may affect circRNA-miRNA-mRNA co-expression in CRC and further affect the regulation of cancer-related target genes.
Methods
First, High-throughput MeRIP-sequencing and RNA-sequencing was used to determine the difference in m6A methylome and expression of circRNA between CRC tissues and tumor-adjacent normal control (NC) tissues. Then, GO and KEGG analysis detected pathways involved in differentially methylated and differentially expressed circRNAs (DEGs). The correlations between m6A status and expression level were calculated using a Pearson correlation analysis. Next, the networks of circRNA-miRNA-mRNA were visualized using the Target Scan and miRanda software. Finally, We describe the relationship of distance between the m6A peak and internal ribosome entry site (IRES) and protein coding potential of circRNAs.
Purpose
To characterize the entire profile of m6A modifications and differential expression patterns for circRNAs in colorectal cancer (CRC).
Results
A total of 4340 m6A peaks of circRNAs in CRC tissue and 3216 m6A peaks of circRNAs in NC tissues were detected. A total of 2561 m6A circRNAs in CRC tissues and 2129 m6A circRNAs in NC tissues were detected. Pathway analysis detected that differentially methylated and expressed circRNAs were closely related to cancer. The conjoint analysis of MeRIP-seq and RNA-seq data discovered 30 circRNAs with differentially m6A methylated and synchronously differential expression. RT-qPCR showned circRNAs (has_circ_0032821, has_circ_0019079, has_circ_0093688) were upregulated and circRNAs (hsa_circ_0026782, hsa_circ_0108457) were downregulated in CRC. In the ceRNA network, the 10 hyper-up circRNAs were shown to be associated with 19 miRNAs and regulate 16 mRNAs, 14 hypo-down circRNAs were associated with 30 miRNAs and regulated 27 mRNAs. There was no significant correlation between the level of m6A and the expression of circRNAs. The distance between the m6A peak and IRES was not significantly related to the protein coding potential of circRNAs.