Comparison of Efficiency of Gutta Percha Removal in Retreatment Using Protaper Retreatment Files, Race Instruments and Reciproc R: An In vitro Study

使用Protaper再治疗锉、Race Instruments和Reciproc R进行牙胶再治疗去除效率的比较:一项体外研究

阅读:1

Abstract

AIM: To compare the effectiveness of three retreatment systems ProTaper Universal, D-Race, and Reciproc in removing gutta-percha and sealer from root canal walls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 75 extracted mandibular first premolars were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, then incubated for 3 weeks. Pre- and post-retreatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were taken. The teeth were divided into three groups and retreated with one of the three systems. The remaining filling material was quantified and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). RESULTS: None of the systems completely removed the filling material. Reciproc R was the most effective, followed by D-Race, with ProTaper being the least effective. CONCLUSION: Reciproc R system showed superior efficacy in removing gutta-percha compared to D-Race and ProTaper systems.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。