Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) as a Novel MRI-Based Assessment Tool: Is It an Alternative to the Time-Tested Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) Scan?

椎骨骨质量 (VBQ) 作为一种新型的基于 MRI 的评估工具:它能否替代久经考验的双能 X 射线吸收测量 (DEXA) 扫描?

阅读:1

Abstract

Purpose To compare CT-derived Hounsfield units (HU) and MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) scores with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and to evaluate their diagnostic performance for identifying osteoporosis. Overview of the literature DEXA is the gold standard for assessing bone mineral density (BMD), but it has limitations, including radiation exposure and interference from degenerative changes. HU and VBQ are promising, radiation-free imaging techniques assessing different aspects of bone health: HU reflects trabecular bone density, while VBQ quantifies marrow fat content, inversely related to bone strength. Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of 112 adults who underwent lumbar spine DEXA, CT, and MRI within 30 days. HU was measured at the L3 vertebral body on CT, and VBQ scores were derived from MRI by comparing vertebral signal intensities to cerebrospinal fluid. Correlations with DEXA T-scores and diagnostic performance metrics, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, were assessed. Results HU values demonstrated a positive correlation with DEXA T-scores (r = 0.549, p < 0.001), with decreasing HU values as BMD worsened. VBQ scores showed a weaker, non-significant correlation (r = -0.175, p = 0.064). HU exhibited higher diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.90) than VBQ (AUC = 0.75). Combination testing improved diagnostic performance: series testing (both HU ≤ 110 and VBQ ≥ 3.9) showed 50% sensitivity and 83% specificity, while parallel testing (either HU ≤ 110 or VBQ ≥ 3.9) demonstrated 86% sensitivity and 51% specificity. Conclusions CT-derived HU and MRI-based VBQ scores are complementary biomarkers for osteoporosis assessment. HU offers strong diagnostic accuracy, while VBQ provides a radiation-free alternative. The combination of both methods enhances diagnostic performance, making them valuable for osteoporosis screening, especially when DEXA is unavailable.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。