Conclusion
Our findings highlighted that m6A modification exerted a nonnegligible role in remodeling diverse and complex TME. Quantification of the m6A modification patterns of individual HCC may enhance the comprehension of TME features and facilitate immunotherapeutic plans.
Methods
Here, m6A modification classification was determined for HCC through 23 m6A modifier levels by employing consensus clustering approach. Prognosis analysis was presented for comparing the differences in survival outcomes. The ssGSEA and ESTIMATE approaches were adopted for evaluating the abundances of tumor-infiltrating immune cell populations. The m6A scoring system was computed for reflecting m6A modification classification via PCA algorithm.
Objective
Emerging evidence highlights the clinical implications of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification in HCC. Yet, the roles of m6A modification in modulating cancer immunity and shaping tumor microenvironment (TME) are undefined in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Results
Three m6A modifier-mediated modification patterns were established among HCC specimens, which were characterized by different prognosis, signaling pathways, and TME features. After extracting m6A phenotype-associated DEGs, we determined m6A scores in individual HCC and stratified patients into high- and low-score groups. Patients with low m6A score displayed the survival advantage and higher sensitivity to gemcitabine. Moreover, those with low m6A score possessed the better anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapeutic response in the IMvigor210 immunotherapy cohort.