Conclusion
None of the QoL instruments can be highly recommended as the most suitable instrument for the construct and population of interest. The generic instruments SF-36, SF-12, QWB, WHOQOL-DIS, WHOQOL-BREF, QLI-SCI, QOLP-PD, LS Questions, Lisat-9, and BRFSS are the clinical instruments that have the best measurement properties tested and have the potential to be the current best recommendation for assessing QoL in individuals with SCI.
Methods
The overall methodology was conducted according to Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review guidance and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. A literature search was conducted up to March 2023 on MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, and Embase databases.
Objective
To identify the clinical instruments for assessing the QoL that present the best recommendation for use in people with SCI based on their measurement properties.
Results
Seventy-seven studies were included in this review, and 49 instruments were identified. The overall methodological quality of all studies ranged from insufficient to sufficient, and the level of evidence ranged from very low to high confidence. Twenty-six instruments may have the potential to be recommended, and the other 23 should not be recommended.