Abstract
Alkane thiol self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) have seen widespread utility in the fabrication of electrochemical biosensors. Their utility, however, reflects a potentially significant compromise. While shorter SAMs support efficient electron transfer, they pack poorly and are thus relatively unstable. Longer SAMs are more stable but suffer from less efficient electron transfer, thus degrading sensor performance. Here we use the electrochemical DNA (E-DNA) sensor platform to compare the signaling and stability of biosensors fabricated using a short, six-carbon monothiol with those employing either of two commercially available trihexylthiol anchors (a flexible Letsinger type and a rigid adamantane type). We find that all three anchors support efficient electron transfer and E-DNA signaling, with the gain, specificity, and selectivity of all three being effectively indistinguishable. The stabilities of the three anchors, however, vary significantly. Sensors anchored with the flexible trithiol exhibit enhanced stability, retaining 75% of their original signal and maintaining excellent signaling properties after 50 days storage in buffer. Likewise these sensors exhibit excellent temperature stability and robustness to electrochemical interrogation. The stability of sensors fabricated using the rigid trithiol anchor, by comparison, are similar to those of the monothiol, with both exhibiting significant (>60%) loss of signal upon wet storage or thermocycling. Employing a flexible trithiol anchor in the fabrication of SAM-based electrochemical biosensors may provide a means of improving sensor robustness without sacrificing electron transfer efficiency or otherwise impeding sensor performance.