Abstract
Advances in single-cell sequencing technologies make it possible to study the genome architecture in single cells. The rapid growth of the field has been fueled by the development of innovative single-cell Hi-C protocols. However, the protocols vary considerably in their efficiency, bias, scale and costs, and their relative advantages for different applications are unclear. Here, we compare the two most commonly used single-cell Hi-C protocols. We use long-read sequencing to analyze molecular products of the Hi-C assay and show that whole-genome amplification step results in increased number of artifacts, larger coverage biases, and increased amount of noise compared to PCR-based amplification. Our comparison provides guidance for researchers studying chromatin architecture in individual cells.