Magnetic immunoassay using CdSe/ZnS quantum dots as fluorescent probes to detect the level of DNA methyltransferase 1 in human serum sample

采用CdSe/ZnS量子点作为荧光探针的磁免疫分析法检测人血清样本中的DNA甲基转移酶1水平

阅读:8
作者:Fei Yu #, Ya-Min Xiong #, Song-Cheng Yu, Lei-Liang He, Shan-Shan Niu, Yu-Ming Wu, Jie Liu, Ling-Bo Qu, Li-E Liu, Yong-Jun Wu

Background

DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), a dominant enzyme responsible for the transfer of a methyl group from the universal methyl donor to the 5-position of cytosine residues in DNA, is essential for mammalian development and closely related to cancer and a variety of age-related chronic diseases. DNMT1 has become a useful biomarker in early disease diagnosis and a potential therapeutic target in cancer therapy and drug development. However, till now, most of the studies on DNA methyltransferase (MTase) detection have focused on the prokaryote MTase and its activity.

Conclusion

These indicated that the proposed FLISA method was sensitive and high throughput and can quickly screen the level of DNMT1 in serum samples.

Methods

A magnetic fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay (FLISA) using CdSe/ZnS quantum dots as fluorescent probes was proposed for the rapid and sensitive detection of the DNMT1 level in this study. Key factors that affect the precision and accuracy of the determination of DNMT1 were optimized.

Results

Under the optimal conditions, the limit of detection was 0.1 ng/mL, the linear range was 0.1-1,500 ng/mL, the recovery was 91.67%-106.50%, and the relative standard deviations of intra- and inter-assays were respectively 5.45%-11.29% and 7.03%-11.25%. The cross-reactivity rates with DNA methyltransferases 3a and 3b were only 4.0% and 9.4%, respectively. Furthermore, FLISA was successfully used to detect the levels of DNMT1 in human serum samples, and compared with commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. The results revealed that there was a good correlation between FLISA and commercial ELISA kits (correlation coefficient r=0.866, p=0.001). The linear scope of FLISA was broader than ELISA, and the measurement time was much shorter than ELISA kits.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。