Conclusion
Visualisation of implants with a similar radiopacity as the embedding medium could be considerably improved. µCT scan settings should be selected with the highest possible resolution, and different implant materials should be scanned individually for optimal segmentation. µCT devices with higher resolutions should be preferred. Advances in knowledge: Iodine doped embedding medium is a useful option to increase radiopacity for better visualisation and evaluation of special target structures in µCT.
Methods
To ensure μCT visualisation and contrast enhancement of the evaluated materials, the embedding medium Technovit® VLC7200 was doped with an iodine monomer for higher radiopacity in different concentrations and tested regarding to handling, polymerisation, and histological preparation, and visualisation in µCT. Six different µCT devices were used and compared with regard to scan conditions, contrast, artefacts, image noise, and spatial resolution for the evaluation of the bone-implant blocks.
Objective
Evaluation of μCT scans of bone implant complexes often shows a specific problem: if an implant material has a very similar radiopacity as the embedding medium (e.g. methacrylate resin), the implant is not visible in the μCT image. Segmentation is not possible, and especially osseointegration as one of the most important parameter for biocompatibility is not evaluable.
Results
Visualisation and evaluation of all target structures showed very good results in all μCT scans as well as in histology and histological staining, without negative effects caused by iodine doping. Subsequent evaluation of explants of in vivo experiments without losing important information was possible with iodine doped embedding medium.