Abstract
Biological indexing is the method generally recognized for the certification of propagative grapevines in many countries, and it is mandatory in the European Union. It consists of the evaluation of the plant material after grafting on indicators that are inspected for symptom development. This is a lengthy process that requires well-trained workers, testing field, etc. Alternative diagnostic methods such as serology and RT-qPCR have been discarded for certification because of their intrinsic drawbacks. In turn, high-throughput sequencing (HTS) of plant RNA has been proposed as a plausible alternative to bioassay, but before it is accepted, different aspects of this process must be evaluated. We have compared the HTS of small RNAs with bioassays and other diagnostic methods from a set of 40 grapevine plants submitted for certification. The results allowed the authors the identification of numerous grapevine viruses in the samples, as well as different variants. Besides, relationships between symptom expression and viromes were investigated, in particular leafroll-associated viruses. We compared HTS results using analytical and bioinformatics approaches in order to define minimum acceptable quality standards for certification schemes, resulting in a pipeline proposal. Finally, the comparison between HTS and bioassay resulted favorable for the former in terms of reliability, cost, and timing.