Conclusion
This study benchmarked the differences between the PET data with and without artifacts. It is important to pay attention to the potential existence of these artifacts during GTV contouring, as such artifacts may increase the uncertainties in the lesion volume and the centroid location.
Purpose
Patient respiratory motion can cause image artifacts in positron emission tomography (PET) from PET/computed tomography (CT) and change the quantification of PET for thoracic patients. In this study, respiration-averaged CT (ACT) was used to remove the artifacts, and the changes in standardized uptake value (SUV) and gross tumor volume (GTV) were quantified.
Results
Of the patients, 68% demonstrated respiratory artifacts in the PET(HCT), and for all patients the artifact was removed or reduced in the corresponding PET(ACT). The impact of respiration artifact was the worst for lesions less than 50 cm(3) and located below the dome of the diaphragm. For lesions in this group, the mean SUV(max) difference, GTV volume change, shift in GTV centroid location, and concordance index were 21%, 154%, 2.4 mm, and 0.61, respectively.