Conclusion
Early use of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease patients effectively controls blood glucose and lipid levels, improves renal function, reduces inflammatory responses, and exhibits a low incidence of adverse reactions. This demonstrates high safety and an important role in delaying disease progression. Therefore, it is worth considering clinical promotion and use for this patient population.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 178 patients with diabetic kidney disease admitted to Baoji High Tech Hospital from March 2023 to March 2024. Of these, 88 patients who received early treatment with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin were included in the early SGLT2-i group, while 90 patients receiving later treatment with SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin were included in the late SGLT2-i group. Clinical data, overall effectiveness, adverse reactions, blood glucose, renal function, lipid levels, and inflammatory markers were compared between the two groups.
Objective
To evaluate the potential of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in preventing the progression of diabetic kidney disease and to provide guidance for clinical practice to improve renal health management strategies for diabetic patients.
Results
Prior to treatment, there were no differences in blood glucose indicators between the two groups (all P > 0.05). Following treatment, both groups showed reductions in 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (2hPG), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), with the early SGLT2-i group demonstrating significantly lower values compared to the late SGLT2-i group (all P < 0.05). Similarly, there were no differences in renal function indicators between the two groups before treatment (all P > 0.05). However, following treatment, the early SGLT2-i group showed more noticeable improvements compared to the late SGLT2-i group (P < 0.05). Inflammatory markers and lipid levels followed similar patterns. The overall effectiveness of the early SGLT2-i group was higher than that of the late SGLT2-i group (92.05% vs. 78.89%, P < 0.05), while the incidence of adverse reactions did not differ statistically between the two groups (6.82% vs. 10.00%, P > 0.05).