Conclusion
Additional TCM spleen and stomach conditioning treatment can substantially improve the efficacy in patients with both KOA and OP by adjusting the inflammatory factors and bone turnover markers of patients, improving their joint function, alleviating their pain, and strongly preventing adverse reactions, so it is of great clinical application value.
Methods
The medical records of 108 patients with both KOA and OP treated in Wuhan No. 1 Hospital between February 2020 and December 2021 were retrospectively studied. Among them, 58 patients treated with western medicine alone were assigned to a control group, and 50 patients who received spleen and stomach conditioning treatment in TCM based on western medicine treatment were assigned to an observation group. The efficacy on the two groups was compared. The joint function, pain, inflammatory factors and bone turnover markers in the two groups before and after treatment were analyzed, as well as the incidence of adverse reactions after treatment. The prognosis of the patients at 12 months after treatment was counted, and the influencing factors of poor prognosis were analyzed by multivariate analysis.
Objective
This study was designed to determine the influences of spleen and stomach conditioning treatment in Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) on patients with both knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and osteoporosis (OP).
Results
The observation group showed a notably higher total effective rate than the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the observation group had notably higher Lysholm score, but notably lower Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores than the control group (all P<0.05). After treatment, the bone turnover markers (beta collagen degradation products (β-CTx) and procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP)) in both groups decreased notably (P<0.05), with notably lower levels of them in the observation group than those in the control group (both P<0.05). Additionally, after the treatment, the inflammatory indexes (interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)) in both groups decreased notably (all P<0.05), with notably lower levels of them in the observation group than those in the control group (all P<0.05). Moreover, the observation group presented a notably lower incidence of adverse reactions than the control group (P<0.05). The rate of poor prognosis in the observation group was notably lower than that in the control group. According to multiple logistic regression analysis, older age, higher BMI, higher Kellgren-Lawrence grading based on X-ray and history of bone fracture were independent risk factors for poor prognosis, and spleen and stomach conditioning treatment was an independent protective factor.