Effect of Sitagliptin Versus Glibenclamide on Glycemic Markers, Lipid Profile Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Factors in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: a Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

西他列汀与格列本脲对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖标志物、血脂、炎症和氧化应激因素的影响:一项双盲随机对照试验

阅读:6
作者:Javad Hematyar, Homeira Rashidi, Mehrnoosh Zakerkish, Seyed Peyman Payami, Seyed Bahman Ghaderian

Conclusion

These finding support the favorable effects of Sitagliptin on cardiovascular risks beyond its advantages on insulin-glucose hemostasis in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

This double-blinded randomized controlled trial was performed on patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=54). The treatment group (27 patients) received 100 mg of Sitagliptin once daily + 500 mg Metformin twice daily, orally, for 12 weeks, and the control group (27 patients) was given 5 mg of Glibenclamide once daily + 500 mg Metformin twice daily, also orally, for 12 weeks. Serum levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), lipid profile [cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglyceride (TG)], fasting blood sugar (FBS) and hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), body weight, and body mass index (BMI) were measured before and after the study.

Results

In both groups, the FBS level was significantly reduced from baseline (P=0.03 in the Sitagliptin group and P=0.02 in the Glibenclamide one). The percent of HbA1c was also significantly reduced from baseline in both the Sitagliptin group (P=0.01) and the Glibenclamide one (P=0.008). However, comparing the groups, these changes were not different. In the Sitagliptin group, IL-6 was significantly reduced from baseline (P=0.01) as well as in comparison with the Glibenclamide group (P=0.001). The TG level was significantly lower than the baseline in the Sitagliptin group (P=0.03), so changes between groups were significant (P=0.04). Weight and BMI were significantly increased from baseline in the Glibenclamide group (P=0.02 and P=0.03, respectively), and their changes between the two groups were also significant (P=0.001).

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。