Conclusions
Our results did not show a correlation between MGMT and MLH1 methylation and any clinicopathological feature or survival in our institutional cohort. MLH1 methylation was present mainly in OSCC, whilst MGMT in OPMD represented a modest contribution to field cancerization, with an overall consistency with the TCGA database.
Methods
To determine the percentage of gene methylation in MLH1 and MGMT, pyrosequencing analysis was conducted. Samples were divided as follows: (1) patients diagnosed with OSCC (N = 16); (2) patients with OPDM who developed OSCC in the same location (N = 47); and (3) patients with OPDM who developed OSCC in a different location (N = 22). As a validation cohort in this study, data from The Cancer Genomic Atlas (TCGA) database, particularly regarding Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, was used.
Results
Overall MLH1 methylation levels of 8.6 ± 11.5% and 8.1 ± 9.2% for MGMT were obtained. With regard to MHL1, the OSCC presented the highest degree of methylation with 9.3 ± 7.3% (95%CI 5.1-13.6), and with regards to MGMT, the simultaneous malignancy group presented the highest degree of methylation with 10 ± 13.5% (95%CI 6-10), although no significant differences were found between the groups (p = 0.934 and p = 0.515, respectively). The estimated survival was higher for MGMT methylated cases (19.1 months, 95%CI 19.1-19.1) than for unmethylated cases (9.4 months, 95%CI 6-12.8), but not statistically significant. Conclusions: Our results did not show a correlation between MGMT and MLH1 methylation and any clinicopathological feature or survival in our institutional cohort. MLH1 methylation was present mainly in OSCC, whilst MGMT in OPMD represented a modest contribution to field cancerization, with an overall consistency with the TCGA database.