Teplitskiy相关文献与解析，生知库 | 链接生命科学的每一步

The effect of trainee career intentions on mentor's interest in the trainee: Experimental evidence from academia

学员职业意向对导师兴趣的影响：来自学术界的实验证据

期刊:

影响因子:

doi:10.1016/j.respol.2025.105232

Smirnova, Inna; Shannon, Austin; Teplitskiy, Misha

发表日期：2025

文献求助收藏

A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science

基于模拟的修辞引用对科学影响的分析

期刊:Nature Communications

影响因子:15.7

doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44249-0

Bao, Honglin; Teplitskiy, Misha

发表日期：2024

文献求助收藏

Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals

创新性研究值得开展吗？来自49种期刊同行评审的证据

期刊:Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

影响因子:9.1

doi:10.1073/pnas.2118046119

Teplitskiy, Misha; Peng, Hao; Blasco, Andrea; Lakhani, Karim R

发表日期：2022

文献求助收藏

Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation

保守主义能获得资金支持吗？一项关于负面信息在创新项目评估中作用的实地实验

期刊:Management Science

影响因子:4.9

doi:10.1287/mnsc.2021.4107

Lanei, Jacqueline N; Teplitskiy, Misha; Gray, Gary; Ranu, Hardeep; Menietti, Michael; Guinan, Eva; Lakhani, Karim R

发表日期：2022

文献求助收藏

Author-suggested reviewers rate manuscripts much more favorably: A cross-sectional analysis of the neuroscience section of PLOS ONE

作者推荐的审稿人对稿件的评价更高：PLOS ONE神经科学板块的横断面分析

期刊:PLoS One

影响因子:2.6

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0273994

Acuna, Daniel E; Teplitskiy, Misha; Evans, James A; Kording, Konrad

发表日期：2022

文献求助收藏

The gender gap in scholarly self-promotion on social media

社交媒体上学术自我宣传中的性别差距

Geographical diversity of peer reviewers shapes author success

同行评审员的地域多样性影响作者的成功

Evaluating interdisciplinary research: Disparate outcomes for topic and knowledge base

评估跨学科研究：主题和知识基础的不同结果

The effect of trainee career intentions on mentor's interest in the trainee: Experimental evidence from academia

学员职业意向对导师兴趣的影响：来自学术界的实验证据

A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science

基于模拟的修辞引用对科学影响的分析

Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals

创新性研究值得开展吗？来自49种期刊同行评审的证据

Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation

保守主义能获得资金支持吗？一项关于负面信息在创新项目评估中作用的实地实验

Author-suggested reviewers rate manuscripts much more favorably: A cross-sectional analysis of the neuroscience section of PLOS ONE

作者推荐的审稿人对稿件的评价更高：PLOS ONE神经科学板块的横断面分析