Intracardiac Fibrinolysis and Endothelium Activation Related to Atrial Fibrillation Ablation with Different Techniques.

采用不同技术进行心房颤动消融术时,心内纤维蛋白溶解和内皮激活的关系

阅读:8
作者:Hajas Orsolya, Bagoly Zsuzsa, Tóth Noémi K, Urbancsek Réka, Kiss Alexandra, Kovács Kitti B, Sarkady Ferenc, Nagy Attila, Oláh Anna V, Nagy László, Clemens Marcell, Csiba László, Csanádi Zoltán
OBJECTIVE: The effect of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on fibrinolytic and endothelial activation with currently applied periprocedural anticoagulation has not been explored. We measured markers of fibrinolysis and endothelium activation before and after PVI with the second-generation cryoballoon (Cryo), pulmonary vein ablation catheter (PVAC-Gold), and irrigated radiofrequency (IRF). METHODS: Markers of fibrinolysis and endothelium activation in left atrial (LA) blood samples were measured in 31 patients before and after PVI (Cryo:10, PVAC-Gold: 7, IRF: 14). Periprocedural anticoagulation included uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist and iv heparin (ACT≥300 sec) during LA dwelling. RESULTS: Levels of D-dimer (median; interquartile range, mgFEU/L) increased with all techniques (PVAC: 0.34; 0.24-0.50 versus 0.70; 0.61-1.31; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; PAP complex level (ng/ml) increased after Cryo (247.3, 199.9-331.6 versus 270.9, 227.9-346.7; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; PAI-1 activity (%) decreased with the PVAC (1.931; 0.508-3.859 versus 0.735, 0.240-2.707; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; VWF antigen levels and FVIII activity increased after PVI with all the 3 techniques. The levels of soluble VCAM-1 (ng/ml) did not change after PVAC procedures, but increased after Cryo (542, 6; 428.5-753.1 versus 619.2; 499.8-799.0; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93; p=0.0313, Cryo: 0.33; 0.28-0.49 versus 0.79; 0.65-0.93. CONCLUSION: PVI with contemporary ablation techniques and periprocedural antithrombotic treatment induces coagulation and endothelium activation of similar magnitude with different ablation methods.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。