The Challenge on Liver Ultrasound Tracking (CLUST) was held in conjunction with the MICCAI 2014 conference to enable direct comparison of tracking methods for this application. This paper reports the outcome of this challenge, including setup, methods, results and experiences. The database included 54 2D and 3D sequences of the liver of healthy volunteers and tumor patients under free breathing. Participants had to provide the tracking results of 90% of the data (test set) for pre-defined point-landmarks (healthy volunteers) or for tumor segmentations (patient data). In this paper we compare the best six methods which participated in the challenge. Quantitative evaluation was performed by the organizers with respect to manual annotations. Results of all methods showed a mean tracking error ranging between 1.4âmm and 2.1âmm for 2D points, and between 2.6âmm and 4.6âmm for 3D points. Fusing all automatic results by considering the median tracking results, improved the mean error to 1.2âmm (2D) and 2.5âmm (3D). For all methods, the performance is still not comparable to human inter-rater variability, with a mean tracking error of 0.5-0.6âmm (2D) and 1.2-1.8âmm (3D). The segmentation task was fulfilled only by one participant, resulting in a Dice coefficient ranging from 76.7% to 92.3%. The CLUST database continues to be available and the online leader-board will be updated as an ongoing challenge.
The 2014 liver ultrasound tracking benchmark.
阅读:4
作者:De Luca V, Benz T, Kondo S, König L, Lübke D, Rothlübbers S, Somphone O, Allaire S, Lediju Bell M A, Chung D Y F, Cifor A, Grozea C, Günther M, Jenne J, Kipshagen T, Kowarschik M, Navab N, Rühaak J, Schwaab J, Tanner C
| 期刊: | Physics in Medicine and Biology | 影响因子: | 3.400 |
| 时间: | 2015 | 起止号: | 2015 Jul 21; 60(14):5571-99 |
| doi: | 10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5571 | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
