A critical assessment of sparse PCA (research): why (one should acknowledge that) weights are not loadings.

Principal component analysis (PCA) is an important tool for analyzing large collections of variables. It functions both as a pre-processing tool to summarize many variables into components and as a method to reveal structure in data. Different coefficients play a central role in these two uses. One focuses on the weights when the goal is summarization, while one inspects the loadings if the goal is to reveal structure. It is well known that the solutions to the two approaches can be found by singular value decomposition; weights, loadings, and right singular vectors are mathematically equivalent. What is often overlooked, is that they are no longer equivalent in the setting of sparse PCA methods which induce zeros either in the weights or the loadings. The lack of awareness for this difference has led to questionable research practices in sparse PCA. First, in simulation studies data is generated mostly based only on structures with sparse singular vectors or sparse loadings, neglecting the structure with sparse weights. Second, reported results represent local optima as the iterative routines are often initiated with the right singular vectors. In this paper we critically re-assess sparse PCA methods by also including data generating schemes characterized by sparse weights and different initialization strategies. The results show that relying on commonly used data generating models can lead to over-optimistic conclusions. They also highlight the impact of choice between sparse weights versus sparse loadings methods and the initialization strategies. The practical consequences of this choice are illustrated with empirical datasets.