Quantitative Assessment of Ligand Substituent Effects on σ- and π-Contributions to Fe-N Bonds in Spin Crossover Fe(II) Complexes.

阅读:4
作者:Bondì Luca, Garden Anna L, Totti Federico, Jerabek Paul, Brooker Sally
The effect of para-substituent X on the electronic structure of sixteen tridentate 4-X-(2,6-di(pyrazol-1-yl))-pyridine (bpp(X) ) ligands and the corresponding solution spin crossover [Fe(II) (bpp(X) )(2) ](2+) complexes is analysed further, to supply quantitative insights into the effect of X on the σ-donor and π-acceptor character of the Fe-N(A) (pyridine) bonds. EDA-NOCV on the sixteen LS complexes revealed that neither ΔE(orb,σ+π) (R(2) =0.48) nor ΔE(orb,π) (R(2) =0.31) correlated with the experimental solution T(1/2) values (which are expected to reflect the ligand field imposed on the iron centre), but that ΔE(orb,σ) correlates well (R(2) =0.82) and implies that as X changes from EDG→EWG (Electron Donating to Withdrawing Group), the ligand becomes a better σ-donor. This counter-intuitive result was further probed by Mulliken analysis of the N(A) atomic orbitals: N(A) (p(x) ) involved in the Fe-N σ-bond vs. the perpendicular N(A) (p(z) ) employed in the ligand aromatic π-system. As X changes EDG→EWG, the electron population on N(A) (p(z) ) decreases, making it a better π-acceptor, whilst that in N(A) (p(x) ) increases, making it a better σ-bond donor; both increase ligand field, and T(1/2) as observed. In 2016, Halcrow, Deeth and co-workers proposed an intuitively reasonable explanation of the effect of the para-X substituents on the T(1/2) values in this family of complexes, consistent with the calculated MO energy levels, that M→L π-backdonation dominates in these M-L bonds. Here the quantitative EDA-NOCV analysis of the M-L bond contributions provides a more complete, coherent and detailed picture of the relative impact of M-L σ-versus π-bonding in determining the observed T(1/2) , refining the earlier interpretation and revealing the importance of the σ-bonding. Furthermore, our results are in perfect agreement with the ΔE(HS-LS) vs. σ(p) (+) (X) correlation reported in their work.

特别声明

1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。

2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。

3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。

4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。