The Working Group on Peer Review of the Advisory Committee to the Director of NIH has recommended that at least 4 reviewers should be used to assess each grant application. A sample size analysis of the number of reviewers needed to evaluate grant applications reveals that a substantially larger number of evaluators are required to provide the level of precision that is currently mandated. NIH should adjust their peer review system to account for the number of reviewers needed to provide adequate precision in their evaluations.
Sample size and precision in NIH peer review.
美国国立卫生研究院同行评审中的样本量和精确度
阅读:8
作者:Kaplan David, Lacetera Nicola, Kaplan Celia
| 期刊: | PLoS One | 影响因子: | 2.600 |
| 时间: | 2008 | 起止号: | 2008 Jul 23; 3(7):e2761 |
| doi: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002761 | ||
特别声明
1、本页面内容包含部分的内容是基于公开信息的合理引用;引用内容仅为补充信息,不代表本站立场。
2、若认为本页面引用内容涉及侵权,请及时与本站联系,我们将第一时间处理。
3、其他媒体/个人如需使用本页面原创内容,需注明“来源:[生知库]”并获得授权;使用引用内容的,需自行联系原作者获得许可。
4、投稿及合作请联系:info@biocloudy.com。
